Truman Faculty Evaluation Administration
DISCLAIMER: Results for instructor ratings refer to past implementations of the course. Teachers, methods, and policies may evolve and change for a particular course from semester to semester.

Ling Mid-Major Seminar - LING 398

Olsen, Emily Long

12 Students Enrolled

The instructor was an effective communicator.

Disagree: 1Neutral: 2Strongly Agree: 2
Answer%Number of Responses
Disagree20% 1
Neutral40% 2
Strongly Agree40% 2
Total Number of Respondents: 5

The instructor was approachable.

Agree: 3Strongly Agree: 2
Answer%Number of Responses
Agree60% 3
Strongly Agree40% 2
Total Number of Respondents: 5

Grading was fair.

Neutral: 2Strongly Agree: 2
Answer%Number of Responses
Neutral50% 2
Strongly Agree50% 2
Total Number of Respondents: 4

I learned a lot in this course.

Neutral: 2Agree: 2Strongly Agree: 1
Answer%Number of Responses
Neutral40% 2
Agree40% 2
Strongly Agree20% 1
Total Number of Respondents: 5

The concepts in this class were predominately presented in... (check up to two):

Lecture: 4Group discussion: 2Other: 1
Answer%Number of Responses
Lecture57% 4
Group discussion29% 2
Other14% 1
Total Number of Respondents: 4

On average, the number of hours I spent on coursework outside of class, per week:

2 or less: 43-4: 1
Answer%Number of Responses
2 or less80% 4
3-420% 1
Total Number of Respondents: 5

My grade was based primarily on...

Homework: 1Individual projects: 2No primary component: 1
Answer%Number of Responses
Homework25% 1
Individual projects50% 2
No primary component25% 1
Total Number of Respondents: 4

Most of the test material in this class came from... (check up to two)

There were no tests administered in this course.: 4
Answer%Number of Responses
There were no tests administered in this course.100% 4
Total Number of Respondents: 4